Everyone knows what exhibitionism is: it is the act of exposing oneself to someone who doesn't want to be exposed to. Simple, right? Well, yes... and, no.
The law defines exhibitionism as a willful (that is, not accidental) act carried out with the intention of insulting and offending the victim, usually a female. Furthermore the act must be a public one. Displaying oneself in one's own home does not qualify.
Fairly straightforward so far, but now it gets complicated.
What happens when, for example, a person exposes himself in his own home, but in such a way that the neighbours or passers-by can see? Does that make it a public act?
And what does the word public mean?
Legally, public is taken to mean more than one person. If, then, only one neighbour, or only one passer-by, views the offending organ through an open window, is that person the public? And can a male go around exposing himself as often as he likes, as long as he does it to no more than one person at a time?
Questions multiply and lead to a multitude of possibilities which in turn lead to a multitude of interpretations, so much so that, as we shall see, rulings on the matter are less than consistent. In other words, the word public is interpreted widely, allowing full play for judicial discretion and judicial bias.
Consider for example the following court case: a man, living with his wife and four children, had a disagreement with his wife. He then went into the bedroom and undressed, and came back naked into the living room where he exposed himself to his wife, a daughter aged twenty, and a son aged thirteen. He was convicted and sentenced to six months hard labour. A hefty sentence indeed.
On appeal, his counsel argued that the conviction could not be sustained because exposure can only be an offence if it occurs in a public place or a place open to public view. The learned judge, after due and weighty pondering over this "repulsive and abominable" act, upheld the conviction.
Now consider another court case, which occurred shortly afterwards: a boarder, who occupied a room adjoining the kitchen in a boarding house, was "under the influence of intoxicating liquor" and came from his room to the kitchen dressed only in a singlet and underpants. The front of his underpants was open, and the accused's naked person was exposed to the view of his landlady, her husband, her mother, and her daughter (aged five years) who were in the kitchen.
This, by any measure, is a worse offence than the earlier one, because it occurred in front of strangers, including a girl aged five. But the learned judge ruled that the gist of the offence was "publicly exposing the person" and the house in this case being a private one, that element of "public-ness" was not fulfilled. He promptly discharged the accused.
Here we have two similar cases - the offence is the same and the setting, a private house, is also the same - yet the verdicts could not be more dissimilar.
Please note, we are not offering, in this article, a "correct" interpretation of the word public. We are merely pointing out that the laws relating to exhibitionism are ill-defined and the word public is so broad as to be virtually meaningless.
And we have not even touched on the other element of the crime: that exhibitionism is a willful act carried out with the intention of insulting and offending the victim. What does "insulting and offending" mean? It is an imprecise term that leads to a multitude of interpretations.
To conclude: laws relating to exhibitionism are vague and ill-defined and antiquated. Times have changed and exhibitionism laws need a thorough overhaul, if they are to remain relevant in this day and age.
Article Source: http://www.abcarticledirectory.com
Andrew Toth is the author of the award winning book, The Exhibitionist, the # 1 book on the # 1 sex offence in the world today. Check it out on HERE
Still Searching? Last Chance to find what you're looking for with a Google Custom Search!
Or.... You can search this site using our Bing Custom Search!
Did You Like/Dislike This Article? Give It YOUR Rating!
Please Rate this Article
5 out of 54 out of 53 out of 52 out of 51 out of 5
No Ratings Yet. Be The First To Rate This Article
Powered by ABC Article Directory