The challenge concerning moral and productive political leadership in Africa is essentially the age-old conflict between patriotism and personal gain. For a long time in Africa, this conflict has favoured personal gain because of the agendas that drive African Power. Such agendas are external, in the form of various political and financial interests from former colonial masters and global business, as well as internal, in the form of African businesses and success aspirants desperate to escape the scourge of poverty and ready to pursue and acquire wealth and influence at any cost. The case of Malawi and the ongoing plans for nationwide demonstrations later this week is informative on this point.
There is a plan by the consumer rights watchdog in Malawi to hold protests on the 17 January 2013. The organisers of the protests have put together a petition with 7 areas of concern, which they want the Malawian president, Joyce Banda, to address. The list makes an interesting reading. The Malawian president is asked to stop the floatation of Malawi's currency, observing that the currency floatation that she effected following pressure from the IMF, and the devaluation of the Malawian Kwacha that accompanied it and is now at 107%, is causing severe hardships to the poor. The president is reminded to walk her talk and sell the presidential jet- an act of which boasted greatly and received positive accolades from the international community, but has yet to be accomplished. President Banda is also asked to cut down on her expensive travels, and to declare her assets. Her sudden increase in wealth is now becoming suspicious and Malawians want to know where it all is coming from. The list contains within it an ultimatum promising further protests if the issues are not addressed by President Banda.
The call for mass protests has caused strong reactions from various interest groups. Government sympathisers are strongly against the demonstrations, claiming that dialogue with government is the better way of having the concerns addressed. Critics of the government have shown strong support for the demonstrations, arguing that the President, assured of the support of powerful "femocrats" from the west, already is demonstrating an arrogance that suggests that dialogue would be an exercise in futility.
At face value, the debate caused by the proposed demonstrations may suggest some maturity in Malawian democracy- an example of the freedom that Malawians are enjoying in being able to bring their leaders into account when they are aggrieved with their policies. On close analysis however, both the list of grievances and the nature of the debate that is unfolding over the matter reveals old flaws in the political leadership question in Africa. The debate that has ensued over the proposed protests has not been based on patriotism and what is good for Malawi, but on personal interest and blind loyalty. Those that are benefitting from the presence in office of the current administration are determined to spend huge amounts of money and do whatever is necessary to silence the masses in their struggle to make their voices heard on President Banda's financially oppressive policies- with some success too! A lot of those that were strongly in support of the protests have, as days have gone by, inexplicably changed their views and some have even defected to the ruling People's Party.
This is the dilemma of African political leadership. It is essentially the question of what motivates citizens to either defend an incumbent administration and preserve a prevailing status quo, or to criticise it, call it into account or even remove it.
In order to illustrate this point, I will use two examples.
The first example comes from South Africa. Recently in South Africa, President Jacob Zuma was re-elected as president of the ANC. The path to his re-election was riddled with controversy and was an extremely messy one. Several people died along the way. Meetings were broken up. Bribes were paid to fix the votes. Ghost members proliferated across ANC branches. Jacob Zuma was re-elected despite the fact that he still had allegations that he had received 783 corrupt payments totaling Rand 4.1 million (nearly US$485,000) hanging over his head. There were questions regarding the dropping of the case against him following allegations of political interference in the case by people close to Thabo Mbeki, despite the prosecutor accepting that the case itself had not been tainted. Jacob Zuma's administration had failed to prosecute anyone for the alleged interference, despite the prosecutor calling for the prosecution more than 3 years ago. There were allegations of endless machinations over the appointments of senior members of the police and security services, with briefing, counter-briefing, dismissals and promotions. Finally, and most tellingly, there was the death of 44 miners -- many of them shot at close quarters by police -- during the strikes that swept across the country culminating in the confrontation outside the Lonmin mine at Marikana. Somehow, in spite of all these indications of disturbing moral turpitude, Jacob Zuma was re-elected and continues to rule the ANC ans remains President of South Africa.
The second example comes from Malawi. The vice president of Malawi, Khumbo Kachali ascended to the position by default, just like President Joyce Banda. The difference between Kachali and Banda is that while Banda was elected along with the late Bingu wa Mutharika as his running mate in 2009 and therefore has a constitutional mandate, Kachali finds himself in the position of the vice presidency simply by virtue of being vice president of Joyce Banda's People's Party (PP) during the time when Banda took over the presidency. Kachali has therefore no electoral mandate for the Vice Presidency.
Kachali's vice presidency is nevertheless controversial and rather disconcerting. There is proof that in order to boost the chances of a People's Party candidate to win a by-election, Kachali went to a government hospital in Mponela at night and stole hospital beds, transporting them to Mzuzu to be distributed there by the PP candidate. Kachali has, since ascending to the vice presidency, been verbally abusing Malawians in his speeches. Recently, he caused controversy at a public rally when he called for the country's minister of justice to arrest John Kapito, the chairman of the Consumers Association of Malawi for being a strong supporter and one of the organisers of the planned demonstrations. Kachali's called on the minister of justice to resurrect an old case which the government had long withdrawn against Kapito and urged that this case should be used to persecute Kapito for his part in organising the planned demonstrations. Kachali also has not declared his assets, his ever increasing wealth is unexplained, and his abuse of office allegations are just too numerous to mention.
Astonishingly, the list of grievances for President Banda to address does not call upon Kachali to resign or even mention him at all. In other, perhaps more mature democracies, the behaviour of vice President Khumbo Kachali would alone be enough for mass protest demanding that either him or the whole government resign! Indeed, critics would be quick to point out that while President Banda has electoral claim to the position due to the fallacies thrown up by the Malawian Constitution, the electoral never intended for Kachali to be this involved in running the affairs of state and he should be as far away from governing as possible because of the unethical behaviour he has so far demonstrated. Yet just like Jacob Zuma of South Africa, Kachali remains, because of the mysterious entities that benefit from his proximity to power and wield enough political force to keep him in place.
Based on the two examples above then, and many similar ones all across Africa, it is my contention that the African Political Leadership Dilemma is in essence a dilemma of our own creation as citizens of Africa. To a certain extent, and for self-serving reasons, we have failed as citizens of Africa to create or demand leadership of the quality that we so much talk about. As citizens of this great continent, our problem has been our failure to genuinely demand better leadership, and to deal decisively with political leaders that destroy the continent.
The Jacob Zumas and the Khumbo Kachalis remain in power because as citizens, we keep them there. There are those among us who benefit from having such leadership in place and unfortunately because of the selfish few, the whole continent suffers.
Copyright (c) 2013 Z. Allan Ntata
Article Source: http://www.abcarticledirectory.com
www.thezambezian.com delivers latest breaking news and information on the top stories, weather, business, entertainment, politics, and more. Emphasis on Southern African and SADC member countries.
Still Searching? Last Chance to find what you're looking for with a Google Custom Search!
Or.... You can search this site using our Bing Custom Search!
Did You Like/Dislike This Article? Give It YOUR Rating!
Please Rate this Article
5 out of 54 out of 53 out of 52 out of 51 out of 5
No Ratings Yet. Be The First To Rate This Article
Powered by ABC Article Directory